Archivos Espanoles en Red
|
I don't think so but I know it is a film that can be bought from the
|
||||||||||||
|
I don't think so but I know it is a film that can be bought from the
|
||||||||||||
An excerpt from the Whitewashed Adobe book in the general tone of what I think you are referencing: The Mexican race now see, in the fate of the aborigines of the north, their own inevitable destiny. They must amalgamante and be lost, in the superior vigor of the Anglo-Saxon race, or they must utterly perish. They may postpone the hour for a time, but it will come, when their nationallity shall cease. -- Democratic Review, February 1847 --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, Alberto Duartewrote: > > When I was in college back in the early '60s, I read a > number of old news articles that were written by a > California judge in the late 1800s about Mexicans and > they were very cruel. You could actually feel the > hatred he had for us even back at that time. After > the military take over by the Americans of California, > life must have been very hard for our people. > > Freedom does have a price. > > Alberto Duarte Prieto. > Santa Maria, California > > -
Angie,
Thank you, I didnt not know this.
~~glo~~
From: "aajay1073"
Reply-To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
To: ranchos@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ranchos] Re: Mexican Border
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:36:00 -0000
Glo,
Here is some information:
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Guadalupe_Hildalgo
Maps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:National-atlas-territorial-
acquisitions.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Territorial-acquisition-uscensus-
bureau.jpg
If the links wrap be sure to recreate in address bar.
- Angie
--- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "glo Sandoval-Fuentes"
wrote:
>
> I would like to hear further on this because I always thought that
Mexico
> did own California too, like till the beginning of the 1900's?
>
>
>
> ~~glo~~
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
When I was in college back in the early '60s, I read a number of old news articles that were written by a California judge in the late 1800s about Mexicans and they were very cruel. You could actually feel the hatred he had for us even back at that time. After the military take over by the Americans of California, life must have been very hard for our people. Freedom does have a price. Alberto Duarte Prieto. Santa Maria, California --- Arturo Ramoswrote: > Ed/Angie: > > Whatever the political status of the American > Southwest was > throughout the 1700s and early 1800s, it was if not > indigenous in > identity, certainly Mexican. Most of the settlers > in the area were > not Spaniards, as a lot of Anglo revisionist > historians like to > purport by glorifying the missions, etc., but > Mexicans... Tlaxacaltec > colonizers in New Mexico, immigrants from Sonora, > Chihuahua, > Aguascalientes, etc... The original founding > families of Culver City, >
Arturo, I uploaded a part of my assignment. This is not revised yet. As you will see the Number column is blank. What sequence are you following? Victor --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos"wrote: > > Victor: > > That is fine, if you are unable to decode words, simply highlight > them, or put in three underscores (___) or both instead and we can > collectively go back and try to fill those in when we are done. > > I have been able to decode more and more as I spend more time with > the text as you start learning the quirks of the specific > handwriting. This one is actually pretty good penmanship compared to > some others I have seen. As far as the surnames, you will have to > make the call. Often if it is a surname it will be repeated later on > in the same or neighboring rancho. I ran across a lot of "Carlos" > and was at first putting it as part of the first name but then when I > saw it next to women's names further down, I realized
I have noticed children taking on maternal names when land titles were associated with the maternal line... i.e. the child's maternal grandfather was a big landowner and so the child took on the name that went with the land (and prestige presumably). Emilie, Tlaltenango is the main city in the valley that constitutes the "southern arm" of Zacatecas that is trapped between Aguascalientes and Jalisco. It was the alcaldia for what is now Totatiche, Atolinga, Tepechitlan, Mezquital del Oro, etc. I have both Talamantes and Avilas interspersed in my genealogy, also from Tlaltenango. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Emilie Garcia"wrote: > > > "The original founding families of Culver City, > California, for example were the Talamantes and Avila from > Aguascalientes... probably related to some people in the group". > > Yes Arturo, > > There is a Talamantes from Taltenango (where is that? I can't find it in a map) in my husband's lines in
|
"The original founding
families of Culver City, California, for example were the Talamantes and Avila from Aguascalientes... probably related to some people in the group". Yes Arturo,
There is a Talamantes from Taltenango (where is
that? I can't find it in a map) in my husband's lines in the Jalisco records, but his son did not take on his surname. He took on his mother's surname, Cervantes. Do you think he did that because his Talamantes father was indigenous (his father's mother was surnamed Diegina), and it would bode him better if he were known as a Cervantes? Especially if he looked espanol as my husband does? I notice that trend (to take the mother's surname) among the children of many Espanolas who married Indian men with or without surnames. Their races were not noted since this was in 1839 in Encarnacion de Diaz. Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA --
|
|
Is this a film available from the Family History Centers? I know that
they have some records from that Archivo, and so does Ancestry.com. Emilie Garcia
Port Orchard, WA ---
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I had to ask my husband what "xenophobia" means. However,
the US wasn't xenophobic when they took over lands long inhabited by Native Americans, who were not Christian and lived like savages. I think they stopped at the present Mexican and Canadian borders because by then, the Mexicans were very Christianized and Europeanized (the language, government, military, etc) as were the Canadians. They were no longer such pushovers, and there may have been the fear that if the US continued to "acquire" more land, the Russians, English, French and Spanish would step in. The US probably realized then that they did not want to overextend themselves and lose land the way the English and Spanish and French had. Even for them there was a limit. Now they seem to want to close the borders to protect what they have acquired thus far. My husband said that he heard someone on a talk show say that the way to stop "illegal" immigration is to give the former Mexican lands back, ha |
Victor: That is fine, if you are unable to decode words, simply highlight them, or put in three underscores (___) or both instead and we can collectively go back and try to fill those in when we are done. I have been able to decode more and more as I spend more time with the text as you start learning the quirks of the specific handwriting. This one is actually pretty good penmanship compared to some others I have seen. As far as the surnames, you will have to make the call. Often if it is a surname it will be repeated later on in the same or neighboring rancho. I ran across a lot of "Carlos" and was at first putting it as part of the first name but then when I saw it next to women's names further down, I realized it was a surname and went back and changed them. Can you upload what you have done as you finish chunks. That way we can keep track of where people are and help in the decoding. When you have another newer version, simply delete the existing one and
|
Joseph, I could not open the file. what format is it in? Elvira ----- Original Message ----- style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> |
There are a few words that I haven't been able to decode. I'm highlighting those cells to get back to them. When I finish the extraction I'll give a second pass to everything and those words that I'm still not able to decipher I'll ask for your help. Another problem in some instances is deciding when one word is a surname or is part of the given name. How are you handling those? --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos"wrote: > > I have uploaded the first three pages of my section so that you can > see what the data entry looks like. It is in the Colotlan folder in > the files section of this site. > > Joseph... if you think we should move this to Ranchos2, please go > ahead and do so and just let us know. > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos" > wrote: > > > > Victor, Alicia, Joseph et. al. > > > > I have created a folder in the files section for Ranchos that has > > instructions on how to do the transcription
I have uploaded the first three pages of my section so that you can see what the data entry looks like. It is in the Colotlan folder in the files section of this site. Joseph... if you think we should move this to Ranchos2, please go ahead and do so and just let us know. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos"wrote: > > Victor, Alicia, Joseph et. al. > > I have created a folder in the files section for Ranchos that has > instructions on how to do the transcription of the Colotlan Census. > It is at the end of member genealogy folders. > > Joseph has volunteered to take pages 90 to 100. These pages are all > names. There are names and text interspersed through about page 130, > so Victor, if you can take pages 101-110 and Alicia, if you can take > pages 111-120, I will take pages 121-130. > > If there are others interested in doing transcription, the remainder > of the document is mostly text. Please write me an email and I will >
Ed/Angie: Whatever the political status of the American Southwest was throughout the 1700s and early 1800s, it was if not indigenous in identity, certainly Mexican. Most of the settlers in the area were not Spaniards, as a lot of Anglo revisionist historians like to purport by glorifying the missions, etc., but Mexicans... Tlaxacaltec colonizers in New Mexico, immigrants from Sonora, Chihuahua, Aguascalientes, etc... The original founding families of Culver City, California, for example were the Talamantes and Avila from Aguascalientes... probably related to some people in the group. The following book is very well researched and provides a whole new insight into the attempted "de-Mexicanization" of Los Angeles. A very good read. Whitewashed Adobe : The Rise of Los Angeles and the Remaking of Its Mexican Past by William Deverell Review: Chronicling the rise of Los Angeles through shifting ideas of race and ethnicity, William Deverell offers a unique perspective on
It still is. Alberto Duarte Prieto Santa Maria, Californai --- Arturo Ramoswrote: > Yes Angie, those maps are great. Emilie, I think > the reason why the > U.S. did not aquire all of Mexico was that the part > they did not > acquire had too many Mexicans living in it. In > other words, the > xenophobia was greater than the greed. > > --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Emilie Garcia" > > wrote: > > > > Wow, Angie, > > > > You are a great researcher. I have never seen > those maps before. > Thanks much for the links to those maps. It really > helps me to > understand the scope of "Manifest Destiny" of the US > Government. I'm > surprised they didn't "acquire" all of Mexico. > > > > Emilie Garcia > > Port Orchard, WA --- > > > > > > > __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Good links. Here's a morphing map from pbs. http://www.pbs.org/kpbs/theborder/history/morphingmap.html Are we done? ;-) --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Emilie Garcia"wrote: > > Wow, Angie, > > You are a great researcher. I have never seen those maps before. Thanks much for the links to those maps. It really helps me to understand the scope of "Manifest Destiny" of the US Government. I'm surprised they didn't "acquire" all of Mexico. > > Emilie Garcia > Port Orchard, WA --- >
Yes Angie, those maps are great. Emilie, I think the reason why the U.S. did not aquire all of Mexico was that the part they did not acquire had too many Mexicans living in it. In other words, the xenophobia was greater than the greed. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Emilie Garcia"wrote: > > Wow, Angie, > > You are a great researcher. I have never seen those maps before. Thanks much for the links to those maps. It really helps me to understand the scope of "Manifest Destiny" of the US Government. I'm surprised they didn't "acquire" all of Mexico. > > Emilie Garcia > Port Orchard, WA --- >
|
Wow, Angie, You are a great researcher. I have never seen those maps before. Thanks much for the links to those maps. It really helps me to understand the scope of "Manifest Destiny" of the US Government. I'm surprised they didn't "acquire" all of Mexico. Emilie Garcia Port Orchard, WA ---
|
|
here are a couple more pages. of the 1785
Census. joseph ps: Arturo if the format is not correct let me know ASAP ![]() |
Attachment:
1785ColotlanCensus_P89-91.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet
1. Enter Archivos Espanoles en Red You will need to create an account if you do not yet have one. Go to http://www.aer.es and click on "Alta de Usuario". Fill in all of the required information and when you reach the last fields "usuario" and "contrasena" make sure that your username/usuario is no longer than 10 characters... one of the many arbitrary restrictions of the site.
[[[[[[[[[[[[Arturo its been a long time and from what I remember it was
more challenging that this to get started.
Here is the url that give more details on the Subscribing process: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ranchos2/files/Archivos%20Espanoles%20en%20Red/ http://www.ldelpino.com/aeren.html ]]]]]]]]]]]]] 2. Log into AER and find document Log in using your username and password. You must click on the "Aceptar"
text under the password field. Simply hitting enter will not work.
Once
logged in mouse over the "busqueda" menu heading on the upper left.
Click
on the "Busqueda por
|
Awhile back I was going to order this film
from the Archivo de Indias: C-7025 in one description it made reference to a 1773 Census of Colotlan
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Victor, Alicia, Joseph et. al. I have created a folder in the files section for Ranchos that has instructions on how to do the transcription of the Colotlan Census. It is at the end of member genealogy folders. Joseph has volunteered to take pages 90 to 100. These pages are all names. There are names and text interspersed through about page 130, so Victor, if you can take pages 101-110 and Alicia, if you can take pages 111-120, I will take pages 121-130. If there are others interested in doing transcription, the remainder of the document is mostly text. Please write me an email and I will assign a piece to you. --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos"wrote: > > There is a 1785 Census of the Colotlan region that is held at the > Archives of Simanca in Spain and has bee digitized. > > I was thinking that perhaps we could get a few volunteers from the > group to help transcribe it and then perhaps even publish it. I think > it would
Arturo, Not sure if I can meet your standards but I can give it a try. Give me a few pages that nobody is currently working on and what are the team guidelines we have to follow. Victor --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Arturo Ramos"wrote: > > There is a 1785 Census of the Colotlan region that is held at the > Archives of Simanca in Spain and has bee digitized. > > I was thinking that perhaps we could get a few volunteers from the > group to help transcribe it and then perhaps even publish it. I think > it would be very useful for many people in the group and as far as I > know, it has not previously been published. > > The document can be found on Archivos Espanoles en Red at: > > ES.47161.AGS/19.8//SGU,7015,2 > > Let me know if you are interested in helping out on this project. >
Wow Elvira, you are just a wealth of information. It's no wonder, though, it sounds like you've been researching for over 25 years. Too bad you don't live in the Sacramento, CA area so that you could meet with the group of us Rancho members who are getting together next month. We have some really talented and experienced researchers attending this first meeting, but you (and several others) would be such a great addition. Maria --- In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "elviraz"wrote: > > Jose Roman: > > > What you are suggesting is exactly what I did for the town of San Juan de Guadalupe, Durango. I had been trying to get info from there for about 25 years and the priests would not relent. The registro civil was okay but that was it. I found out that the LDS church would pay for the microfilming and I started campaigning. I was fortunate to meet the president of the Sociedad Genealogica del Norte de Mexico (Benicio Sanchez). I told him my situation and
|
Wow Arturo that 1785 Census is so cool! What a discovery. I'm ready to src="jpgicPWaROIwZ.jpg" border="0"> |
Attachment:
1785ColotlanCensus_P89-100.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet